Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Davis #222490 v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00171
Plaintiff:
Earl Demetrius Davis #222490
Defendant:
Michael Brown, Bruce Biggers, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Sperling et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Kyle Sperling and Corizon Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Gender Dysphoria Recomendation Committee, Patricia Schmidit, J. Winger and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tippins #342855 v. Parish et al
as 1:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Unknown Wert, T. Bassett, Unknown Vogue and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tippins #342855
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waller v. Doe, et al.
as 3:2019cv00751
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Doe Owen(s), Warden Polk, Sergeant Herring and others
Plaintiff:
Byron D. Waller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare, Inc, Lynndy Houston-Fagan, Susan O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Shaun Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp v. Rigney et al
as 8:2018cv00927
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Kemp
Defendant:
A. Rigney, Sr., H. Stone, FNU Bandi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lingo v. Corizon Healthcare Inc et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00583
Plaintiff:
Ralph Wilson Lingo
Defendant:
Corizon Healthcare Inc, Nurse Parker, Nurse Guice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Kent et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00355
Plaintiff:
Duane Carter
Defendant:
J. Kent, Stewart Sanford and Corizon Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kospgliad v. C.O. Bakare et al
as 1:2013cv07167
Plaintiff:
Eugeni Kospgliad
Defendant:
C.O. Bakare, Corizon Healthcare Inc., Yolanda Canty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
