Cases 31 - 40 of 198
Kensu v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv10175
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dan Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gallion v. Migliori et al
as 1:2017cv00526
Plaintiff:
Eric James Gallion
Defendant:
John Migliori, Grant Roberts, Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rendon v. Yordy et al
as 1:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Steven J Rendon
Defendant:
Keith Yordy, Randy Blades, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Yordy et al
as 1:2017cv00394
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Dixon
Defendant:
Keith Yordy, Randy Blades, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lamont Williamson
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Ian Wallace, Mina Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zazweta v. Dentist Unknown et al
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff:
Dominick A Zazweta
Defendant:
Dentist Unknown, IMSI, Corizon, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Idaho State Board of Correction et al
as 1:2017cv00293
Plaintiff:
Derek A Maxwell
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Correction, Corizon, Inc., Jeremy Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Farr v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, et al
as 17-5482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. FARR
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, LLC, CORIZON, INC., DR. CRUMP and others
BERRY v. JAY, et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
JAVON CROCKETT BERRY and JAVON LANCE CROCKETT BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON INC and others
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
