Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Moss v. Corizon CMS et al
as 2:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
John T Moss
Defendant:
Corizon CMS, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wasson v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Anna Wasson
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction , Corizon Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Corizon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Ken Anderson
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Sonya A Pepper-Davis, Jacqueline R Carswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton et al v. Corizon Health Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Larry G Dukes and Candace Y Hinton
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc, Corizon Inc, AllCare Correctional LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Leggett v. Corizon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00180
Plaintiff:
Charles H Leggett
Defendant:
Corizon Inc and Connie Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway v. Corizon Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Byron L Conway
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Betty Hutchinson, Melvin Nance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatom v. Corizon Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Tatom, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Gordon, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sey v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
MeLoni Annesta Sey
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon Inc, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater v. Moore et al
as 5:2013cv00076
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Troy Glen Moore and Caballa
Plaintiff:
John W Bridgewater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridgewater v. Moore et al
as 5:2013cv05047
Plaintiff:
John W. Bridgewater
Defendant:
Troy Glen Moore, Caballa and Corizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
