Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kirksey v. Parker
as 2:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirksey, Terrance v. Correctional Officer Parker
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Parker
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase, Jr. v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Eastern Correctional Institution, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Chase, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Warrick et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv03326
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Ocean, Correctional Officer Sgt. Lockemy, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
James Hardin, John State, David Warrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Boston v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv02315
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mccall, Correctional Officer Parker, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De'Shields v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv08885
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. De'Shields
Defendant:
City of New York, Captain Thomas, Correction Officer Gattor and others
Interested Party:
New York City Law Department Corporation Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Trocchia et al
as 1:2018cv07276
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Massey
Defendant:
Captain Pichardo, Captain Liburd, Correction Officer Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv09264
Plaintiff:
Lee Ester Davis
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Correctional Officer Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
