Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Adamides et al v. The City Of Rochester et al
as 6:2024cv06107
Plaintiff:
Katherine Adamides, Tyrus Asa Adams, Joe Allman and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Henry Favor, Naser Zenelovic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. CHESTER USPS POST OFFICE et al
as 2:2022cv03397
Plaintiff:
CORI ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHESTER USPS, ANN D BRYANT and CHESTER USPS POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Robinson v. Robinson
as 5:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cory Robinson
Defendant:
Jennie W. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCNEIL v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv05941
Defendant:
CORY ROBINSON, DONALD LEMONS and KURT GUNSON
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ALLEN MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEIL v. BRINING et al
as 1:2021cv05939
Defendant:
CORY ROBINSON, JOHN ELLIS and JAMES BRINING
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ALLEN MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2021cv00110
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Cory Robinson
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79983
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CORY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MONTGOMERY v. LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al
as 2:2015cv02815
Plaintiff:
JAMERE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
LABORERS LOCAL 332 , RYAN N. BOYER , SAMUEL STATEN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
