Cases 31 - 40 of 113
David Atwood, II v. Ben Ford, et al
as 17-60257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY HOLBROOKE, Covington County Sheriff's Department, DETECTIVE PAMELA WADE SMITH, Covington County Sheriff's Department, DEPUTY ANGIE DIEHL, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Creel v. Bowen et al
as 2:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Walter Creel
Defendant:
Eddie H. Bowen, Jim Hood, Danial C. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Covington County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Gentry
Defendant:
Covington County Sheriff Dept., MCS Inc, Sumrall City Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Chandler v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00708
Plaintiff:
David K. Chandler
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Covington County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S.H. v. Covington County School District
as 2:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
S.H.
Defendant:
Covington County School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitlock v. 22nd Judicial Circuit et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00755
Plaintiff:
Kumoski Whitlock
Defendant:
22nd Judicial Circuit and Covington County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
David Atwood, II v. Ben Ford, et al
as 15-60454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF BEN FORD, Former Sheriff of Covington County, SHERIFF STANN SMITH, Current Sheriff of Covington County, DEPUTY HOLBROOKE, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
