Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,971
Tyson v. Rewerts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv10232
Petitioner: Craig Laquintz Tyson
Respondent: Warden and Randee Rewerts
Danyale Tubbs v. Anne Cunningham, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff: DANYALE SHARRON TUBBS
Defendant: ANNE CUNNINGHAM, Registered Dental Hygienist in her individual capacity, CRAIG HARLESS, Dentist in his individual capacity and BEVERLY ANDERSON, Dental Assistant in her individual capacity
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant: Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff: James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: Craig D'jaun Williams
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Moore v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner: Michael Ernest Moore
Respondent: Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff: Alexa Holland and Craig Holland
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cunningham v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: Craig Cunningham
Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Banks v. Atwell et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant: Craig Atwell, Darrell Smith and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Craig Trout
as 23-2108
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CRAIG ROBERT TROUT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?