Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Stewart v. Albany County et al
as 9:2019cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kazhmel Stewart
Defendant:
Albany County, Michael Lyons and Craig D. Apple, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv02907
Defendant:
Frank Foe, "John" Calangione, Ryan Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
J'von Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cepeda v. Apple, Sr. et al
as 9:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Craig D. Apple, Sr., John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Cepeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montoya-Cruz v. Feeley et al
as 6:2019cv06008
Respondent:
Kirstjen M Nielsen, Matthew G Whitaker, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Elmis Adalid Montoya-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv12306
Defendant:
Ryan Lawson, Matthew Labombard, Frank Foe Shield #323 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Espinal, John Doe, Pariis Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montoya-Cruz v. Feeley et al
as 9:2018cv01410
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Thomas Feeley, Craig D. Apple, Sr. and others
Petitioner:
Elmis Adalid Montoya-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McGowan v. Apple
as 9:2017cv00480
Petitioner:
Jeremy McGowan
Respondent:
Craig D. Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medina v. Apple et al
as 9:2016cv01284
Plaintiff:
Miguel Medina
Defendant:
Craig D. Apple, John Doe, Sgt. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keyes v. Apple
as 9:2016cv01111
Defendant:
Apple
Plaintiff:
Keyes
Petitioner:
Mitchell Keyes
Respondent:
Craig D. Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belgrove v. The County of Albany et al
as 1:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Emajin Belgrove
Defendant:
The County of Albany, Craig D. Apple, Sr. and John Doe #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
