Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ladendorf et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Roy Robert Landendorf, Cornell Knox, Shanti Koko and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Landendorf et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Roy Robert Landendorf, Cornell Knox, Shanti Koko and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Maxwell et al v. Foris Dax, Inc.
as 1:2023cv23787
Plaintiff:
Craig Maxwell and Crypto Advocates
Defendant:
Foris Dax, Inc. doing business as Crypto.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Allen et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as GAN/1:17-cv-04544
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen , Dean Armstrong , Eric Barber and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Kyani, Inc. v. Jordan et al
as 4:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kyani, Inc.
Defendant:
Ardria Jordan , Alyssa Jordan and Craig Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Israel v. Bailey et al
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Matthew Israel
Defendant:
Pamela G. Bailey, Jean Hobby, Thomas J. Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Maxwell v. Allen et al
as 3:2010cv02066
Petitioner:
Michael Craig Maxwell
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MAXWELL, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv76010
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CRAIG MAXWELL
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Maxwell v. State of South Carolina
as 3:2007cv01810
Petitioner:
Craig Maxwell
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
