Cases 1 - 10 of 1,070
(PC) Howard v. Komaki, et al.
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
Emi Komaki, BD Young, C Caldua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Curry v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00956
Petitioner:
David Henry Curry
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Curry et al
as 2:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Mitereo Ramirez
Defendant:
Curry, Walden, Brian Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wise et al
as 4:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill and Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Todd Wise, Jon Coers, Aaron Kershaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gotoy v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Shahied Gotoy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Jeremy Bean, Omar Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Mello et al
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Maia Mello, Clayton Joseph Lance and Curry County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Lance et al
as 6:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Clayton J. Lance, Maia Mello, Curry County, OR, Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08507
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Curry
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kauffman #360639 v. Department of Child Safety et al
as 3:2023cv08128
Plaintiff:
Zion Z Kauffman and Luke Z Yochai-Adams-Trimmer
Defendant:
Department of Child Safety, Arizona, State of, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
