Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Netchoice LLC, et al v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 21-12355
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NETCHOICE LLC, d.b.a. Netchoice and COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, d.b.a. CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JONI ALEXIS POITIER, JASON TODD ALLEN and others
NETCHOICE LLC et al v. MOODY et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, PATRICK GILLESPIE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION doing business as CCIA, NETCHOICE, LLC doing business as NETCHOICE and NETCHOICE LLC doing business as NETCHOICE
Amicus Curiae:
TECHFREEDOM, CHAMBER OF PROGRESS, CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC v. LEE
as 4:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF FLORIDA INC, FAIR VOTE FLORIDA, OUR VOTES MATTER and others
Defendant:
LAUREL LEE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER, KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HETHERINGTON v. LEE
as 3:2021cv00671
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
KELLS HETHERINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00731
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Curry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CURRY-SMITH v. Social Security
as 4:2018cv11803
Plaintiff:
REMARO L. CURRY-SMITH
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Smith, Jr. et al v. Central Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
Alfred Smith, Jr. and Currie Smith
Defendant:
Central Mutual Insurance Company , James David Boruk and Michael Trevino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Cooper et al
as 6:2010cv00502
Plaintiff:
Curry Smith
Defendant:
Shermand Cooper, Gregory Avants, William T Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
