Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,804
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
McNeil v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Michael McNeil
Defendant: William Gittere, Walter Romero, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff: Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hampton v. Tucker et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Tyrone Hampton
Defendant: Lane Tucker, Curtis Vic, Christopher Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patino v. Safeway EC
as 3:2024cv02447
Plaintiff: Stephen Curtis Patino
Defendant: Safeway EC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Munger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00208
Petitioner: Curtis Edward Munger
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carroll v. Pitkonen, et al.
as 24-2522
Plaintiff: CURTIS-GENE CARROLL, Aggrieved Plaintiff, Sui Juris
Defendant: TUYET PITKONEN, MARK HODGSON, Attorney, SHAUN HUPPERT, Attorney and others
Markson v. County of Fresno et al
as 1:2024at00320
Plaintiff: Curtis Markson
Defendant: County of Fresno and Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Markson v. County of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff: Curtis Markson
Defendant: County of Fresno and Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belmonte v. King County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff: Damers Shirak Duranzan and David Belmonte
Defendant: King County, King County Department of Public Defense, Anita Khandelwal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?