Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Boyd v. Gary
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boyd, III
Defendant:
Deputy Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Dolgencorp LLC
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Blondell D. Boyd and Blondell Boyd
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cooper v. USA
as 4:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Raymond D. (Boyd) Cooper
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ronald Van Hook v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD VAN HOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, BEAVER, Magistrate Judge; Judge, MCKEE, District Court Judge;Judge and others
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karas v. Boyd et al
as 2:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Laura Karas
Defendant:
William D. Boyd, USAA Insurance Company, Property & Casualty Company of Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
(PC) Calderon v. Bonta et al
as 2:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Calderon
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, P. Covello, William J. Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Francis Santo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jennifer Reis, Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ard v Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marlin Ard
Defendant:
Hilary D Boyd, Oregon State Bar, Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
