Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Foster v. Harvanek
as 6:2017cv00051
Petitioner:
Quincy D. Foster
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Foster v. City of Fairland et al
as 4:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Henry D Foster
Defendant:
City of Fairland and Marvin Asche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02937
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Foster and Charles Foster, LLC
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horton v. Fenlon et al
as 1:2013cv01089
Plaintiff:
Willie Horton
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Mark Collins, P. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mauchlin v. Davis et al
as 1:2012cv01449
Plaintiff:
Peter P. Mauchlin
Defendant:
B.R. Davis, Zhan, Munsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Rangel et al
as 1:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Willie Horton
Defendant:
Blake R. Davis, Mark Collins, P. Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton-Bey v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv02927
Plaintiff:
DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey
Defendant:
B. Davis, L. Milusnic, C. Synsvoll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stine v. Allred
as 11-1426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ALLRED, Mr. Clinical Director ADX
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, BOP, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Regional Dir. BOP N.O. Region and others
Anonymous Human Rights Activist v. Rangel et al
as 1:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
Anonymous Human Rights Activist
Defendant:
P. Rangel, Szemborki, Debra Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preacher v. George, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER, Sui Generis, Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GEORGE, D.H.O. Officer, G. RAMIREZ, D.H.O. Officer, B.R. DAVIS, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
