Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 242
Easter v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03052
Plaintiff: Skyler Dean Easter
Defendant: D. Hudson, (fnu) Sutton, H. Son and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff: DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Hudson v. Marriott Claims Services/Marriott International
as 1:2023cv24821
Plaintiff: Donnika D. Hudson
Defendant: Marriott Claims Services/Marriott International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abbott v. Hudson
as 1:2023cv05852
Petitioner: William R Abbott
Respondent: D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Abbott v. Hudson
as 3:2023cv50321
Petitioner: William R Abbott
Respondent: D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Steele v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv03192
Plaintiff: Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant: Ronald L. Davis, D. Hudson, (fnu) Grecco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daniel v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv03189
Petitioner: Thaddeus Daniel
Respondent: D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Green v. Hudson
as 23-3141
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTHONY MARTIN GREEN
Respondent / Appellee: D. HUDSON, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Barrow v. Hudson
as 23-3137
Petitioner / Appellant: DONNELL BARROW
Respondent / Appellee: D. HUDSON, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Lumpkin v. Dowels et al
as 1:2023cv00990
Plaintiff: Christopher Lumpkin
Defendant: Kemsy Dowels, Clifford Mcdonald, Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?