Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Adams v. Epes Transport System, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv06013
Plaintiff:
Donna Lynn Adams
Defendant:
Epes Transport System, LLC, Penske Logistics, LLC, Johnny D. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
GELB v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv05237
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN G GELB
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO and K D LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Lane et al
as 6:2021cv01934
Plaintiff:
Gregory R. Lane
Defendant:
Rayfield Lane, Mitchell R. Lane, Melody Y. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64950
Plaintiff:
JOHN D LANE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19342
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK D LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv01271
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Lane and Jennifer L. Lane
Defendant:
Quicken Loans Inc. and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Rundquist v. Mayfield et al (MAG+)
as 3:2011cv01068
Plaintiff:
Eric P. Rundquist
Defendant:
Margaret Mayfield , The District Attorney's Office, 37th Judicial Circuit of Alabama , Nick Abbett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2011cv03241
Plaintiff:
Cameron D Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ertl v. Lane (MAG+)
as 1:2009cv00693
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Ertl
Defendant:
John D. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv61681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
