Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DOE et al v. Brynn Marr Hospital, Inc. et al
as 7:2026cv00287
Plaintiff: MARY DOE and JOHN DOE
Defendant: Brynn Marr Hospital, Inc., United Health Services, Inc., UHS of Delaware, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12369
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01237
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MARR v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2026cv00945
Plaintiff: JEANETTE MARR
Defendant: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DiRuzzo et al v. Arredondo et al
as 6:2026cv00030
Plaintiff: Joseph Andrew DiRuzzo and Randall Kelton
Defendant: Roberto Arredondo, Robert Whitaker, James Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiRuzzo et al v. Arredondo et al
as 4:2026cv00489
Plaintiff: Joseph Andrew DiRuzzo and Randall Kelton
Defendant: Roberto Arredondo, Robert Whitaker, James Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAYLE v. YOUNG, MARR, MALLIS & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2026cv02182
Plaintiff: WAYNE SILVERIA GAYLE
Defendant: YOUNG, MARR, MALLIS & ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM, GAIL MARR, NEFF & SEDACCA, P.C. LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verch v. WHM Eye Associates, P.A.
as 4:2026cv02462
Plaintiff: Marco Verch
Defendant: WHM Eye Associates, P.A. doing business as Marr-Kirkland Eye Center
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Abts v. Marr
as 26-1185
Plaintiff: BRANDI ABTS
Defendant: PATRICIA A. MARR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?