Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Velis v. Bangert et al
as 3:2023cv01889
Defendant:
David Bangert doing business as C.H.I. Overhead Doors, LLC formerly known as C.H.I. Overhead Doors, Inc., C.H.I. Overhead Doors, Inc., Beals Larry and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rico Velis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Ron D. Beal, P.A. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
as 20-14854
Defendant / Appellee:
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON D. BEAL, P.A.
Beal v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv01447
Plaintiff:
Ron D. Beal, P.A.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karp v. Edwards et al
as 1:2019cv05798
Defendant:
Charles M. Edwards, Fred H. Jones, FC Merger Subsidiary VII, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp
Parshall v. Entegra Financial Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01152
Defendant:
First Citizens BancShares, Inc., Adam W. Burrell, Fred H. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Beal, Jr. v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2017cv02381
Plaintiff:
Cedric D. Beal, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steger v. Peters et al
as 6:2016cv02093
Defendant:
D. Beal, Brian Belleque, Benaviedez and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Steger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beal #296763 v. Immel et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Semaj D. Beal #296763
Defendant:
Anthony Immel, Scott Sprader, T. Salo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percival #220239 et al v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00097
Plaintiff:
Leon Percival #220239, Diego Galvan #652344, Rason Horton #361861 and others
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, David Isard, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
