Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Living Lands, LLC et al v. Cline et al
as 3:2020cv00275
Plaintiff:
D. C. Chapman Ventures, Inc. and Living Lands, LLC
Defendant:
Jack Cline, B. & S. Contracting, Inc., Robert Lee Cline and others
Smith v. W G D C Detention Center
as 9:2020cv00980
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Smith
Defendant:
W G D C Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv01536
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, T. Forman, D. C. Roundtree and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6926
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN REGIONAL PREA ANALYST, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 19-6217
Defendant:
M. L. COUNTS, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, C. COMBS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
D. C. STALLARD and WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6178
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN REGIONAL PREA ANALYST, GLEN E. CONRAD, U.S. Judge, F. STANLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6173
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Holley v. Meredith et al
as 7:2018cv00535
Defendant:
Hensley, Mr. Rivero, Mr. Marcus Elam and others
Plaintiff:
Garfield W Holley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D. C. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00221
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., a Cardinal Health 414, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
D. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
