Cases
Conely v. Town of Brimfield, MA et al
as 3:2018cv30006
Plaintiff: Richard D Conely
Defendant: Town of Brimfield, MA , William J. Beaudry and Daniel Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toscano v. California Department of Corrections, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01551
Plaintiff: Benjamin K. Toscano
Defendant: State of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Scott Kernan, D. Conee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toscano v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv05617
Plaintiff: Benjamin K. Toscano
Defendant: California Department of Corrections, Scott Kernan, D. Conee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Cones v. County of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv08281
Defendant: Armando Arevalo, Leroy D Baca, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff: Michael D. Cones
Cone v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 5:2014cv00493
Petitioner: Randall D. Cone
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cone v. Crews et al
as 3:2014cv01055
Petitioner: Randall D. Cone
Respondent: Michael D. Crews and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cone v. Cone et al
as 8:2008cv00205
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cone
Defendant: Michael L. Cone, United States of America, Sandpiper Rentals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Actions affecting property which US had lien
Griffin v. Parsons et al
as 3:2007cv00050
Plaintiff: Daniel Althone Griffin, .
Defendant: Cheryl Parsons, Van Harris, Robert D. Cone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Parsons et al
as 5:2007cv00302
Plaintiff: Daniel Althone Griffin
Defendant: Cheryl Parsons, Van Harris, Robert D. Cone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?