Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lichtman v. Dennis et al
as 6:2024cv06038
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Lichtman
Defendant:
Brian D. Dennis, Ontario County Family Court and Ontario County New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hall v. County of Ontario, et al
as 6:2014cv06059
Plaintiff:
Tonya M. Hall
Defendant:
County of Ontario, Brian D. Dennis and Terence Cordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al
as 12-3332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
Landrith v. Schmidt, et al
as 12-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRET DAVID LANDRITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEREK SCHMIDT, Kansas Attorney General, in his personal capacity, DON JORDAN, former Secretary of SRS, in his personal capacity, ROB SIEDLECKI, former Secretary SRS, in his personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Dennis v. Kansas City, MO, City of
as 4:2007cv00596
Plaintiff:
Nikki D Dennis
Defendant:
Kansas City, MO, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
