Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Caplan v. The Collision Center Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21521
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
The Collision Center Inc. and Marc D. Jacobson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jacobson et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06452
Plaintiff:
Ben D. Jacobson and Caroline Hunt Jacobson
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, United Services Automobile Association, USAA General Indemnity Company and others
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JACOBSON v. BURR
as 1:2020cv00799
Plaintiff:
ALAN D JACOBSON and ALAN D. JACOBSON
Defendant:
RICHARD M BURR and RICHARD M. BURR
Adrian Chaparro v. Nnenna Ikegbu, et al
as 19-15012
Defendant / Appellee:
MAUREEN MCLEAN, J. LEWIS, D. JACOBSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADRIAN ARMANDO CHAPARRO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv60803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chaparro v. Ikegbu et al
as 5:2017cv03831
Plaintiff:
Adrian Armando Chaparro
Defendant:
Nnenna Ikegbu, D. Jacobson, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Proskauer Rose LLP et al
as 1:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Moran
Defendant:
Proskauer Rose LLP, Jerold D. Jacobson and Keisha Ann Grace Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Olson et al
as 4:2017cv02087
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Lopez
Defendant:
G. Olson, Bradbury, J. Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JACOBSON et al
as 3:2016cv09388
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS D. JACOBSON, MARYBETH D. JACOBSON and JACOBSON & COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1340
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
