Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MONROE-RICKS v. U.S. ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. et al
as 1:2021cv00833
Defendant:
D.C. GOVERNMENT, U.S. ATTORNEYS FOR D.C. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv02026
Not Yet Classified:
Yamise Rogers and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
YAMISE K. ROGERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES D.C. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ladson v. D.C. Government Office of Risk Management, Conduent Parking and Mobility Solutions et al
as 1:2018cv00994
Defendant:
Robert Carter, D.C. Government Office of Risk Management, Conduent Parking and Mobility Solutions and Mark Derrick
Plaintiff:
AveMaria M. Ladson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurt v. D.C. Government
as 1:2015cv02536
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurt v. The house of Marylind and all hotel et al
as 1:2015cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
The house of Marylind and all hotel, The United States of America, Hate Crimes and KKK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HURT v. D.C. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2013mc00864
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
D.C. GOVERNMENT, CORPORATION COUNCIL OFFICE and D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hurt v. D.C. Government
as 1:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hurt
Defendant:
D.C. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
