Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Oriakhi v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Daniel Oriakhi
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., David Justice, James Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oriakhi v. USA - 2255
as 1:2011cv00865
Petitioner:
Daniel Oriakhi
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Oriakhi et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP) et al
as 3:2010cv02012
Petitioner:
Daniel Oriakhi, Edmund Prescott and Rigoberto Gato-Suris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP) and The Cornell Group/The GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oriakhi et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP) et al
as 1:2010cv00238
Petitioner:
Daniel Oriakhi, Edmund Prescott and Rigoberto Gato-Suris
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, (FBOP) and The Cornell Group/The GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Daniel Oriakhi v. Michael Carroll, et al
as 09-4375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CARROLL, WILLIAM LANGEHENNIG, BROSSAD, Case Manager Coordinator (CMC) and others
ORIAKHI v. CARROLL et al
as 1:2009cv01444
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. CARROLL, WILLIAM LANGEHENNIG, MS. BROSSAD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
US v. Daniel Oriakhi
as 08-8224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
ORIAKHI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv03716
Petitioner:
DANIEL ORIAKHI
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
