Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Shaw v. Fit For Life, N.A., and Fit for Life, LLC
as 1:2022cv02179
Plaintiff:
David Shaw and Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
Fit For Life, N.A., and Fit for Life, LLC, Fit for Life, N.A., L.L.C. and Fit for Life, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniel Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, et al
as 22-1229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NORTON SHORES, GARY NELUND, Mayor; individually and in his official capacity, DANIEL SHAW, Police Chief; individually and in his official capacity and others
SHAW v. THE TOWNSEND CORPORATON
as 2:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SHAW
Defendant:
THE TOWNSEND CORPORATON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Greco D.O. et al v. Matthew Todd Ahern DO et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Defendant:
Encinitas Hospitalist Associates, Scott Alan Eisman MD, Marisa M. Magana MD and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren Larue and Gabriella Francesca Greco D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 mm
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97080
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doster v. Shaw
as 1:2020cv01144
Plaintiff:
Thomas Doster
Defendant:
Daniel Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94828
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv37127
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv00517
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SHAW
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shaw v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv05126
Plaintiff:
Daniel Shaw
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
