Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLAS v. THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS et al
as 2:2013mc00261
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NICHOLAS
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS, DANIEL SNYDER and THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEGUE
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
SNOW v. THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS et al
as 2:2013cv01524
Plaintiff:
KEITH SNOW
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS, DANIEL SNYDER and THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Derrick v. Snyder, Daniel et al
as 3:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Smith
Defendant:
Daniel Snyder, Snyder Law Office and Snyder's insurance company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tina Stigall, et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 13-80045
Plaintiff - Respondent:
TINA STIGALL, a single individual, DANIEL SNYDER, JANET SNYDER, a married couple and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Tina Stigall et al v McKesson Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv02037
Defendant:
Aaidevelopment Services Inc, Aaipharma Inc, Aaipharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Charles Maby Jr, William Smalley, Daniel Snyder and others
SNYDER et al v. SUMMERSET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2011cv01309
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SNYDER and JAIME SNYDER
Defendant:
SUMMERSET NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION and SUMMERSET DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dove v. Broome County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Donald Mack Dove
Defendant:
Broome County Correctional Facility, K. Moore, Timothy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. USA
as 4:2009cv00055
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brian Daniel Snyder
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
