Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Miro et al v. Philippe Chow Boca, LLC et al
as 9:2012cv80544
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Miro , Catalin Ursu , Daniel Wright and others
Defendant:
Clinton Stowe and Philippe Chow Boca LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Burduli v. New York City et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Tamara Burduli
Defendant:
John Doe, New York City and Danielle Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Wright v. Dorothy Swingle, et al
as 11-17275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
DOROTHY E. SWINGLE, FAAFP Chief Medical Officer and J. NEPOMUCENO, Chief Physican and Surgeon
Sennheiser Electronic Corporation et al v. Daniel Wright et al
as 2:2011cv07876
Defendant:
Does and Daniel Wright
Plaintiff:
Sennheiser Electronic Corporation and Sennheiser Electronic GMBH and Co KG
Wright v. Swingle et al
as 2:2011cv01792
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wright
Defendant:
Dorothy Swingle, John Nepomuceno, Charles Nielsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Blanchard, et al v. Jim Overton
as 11-11520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL BLANCHARD, JACQUELYN BLANCHARD, LYNN WRIGHT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JIM OVERTON, in his Capacity as Property Appraiser, Duval County, Florida
Blanchard et al v. Overton
as 3:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Daniel Blanchard , Jacquelyn Blanchard , Lynn Wright and others
Defendant:
Jim Overton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Wilson #325150 v. Leigeib et al
as 1:2010cv00660
Plaintiff:
Harold Lee Wilson #325150, II
Defendant:
Unknown Leigeib, Melissa Hartnagel, Unknown Houtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumas v. McKinney et al
as 1:2009cv02235
Plaintiff:
Jamel S. Dumas
Defendant:
Patrick McKinney, Lebanon City, Lebanon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Wright
as 09-3117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Wright
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
