Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Keen v. Cook et al
as 6:2024cv03086
Plaintiff:
CeCil Keen
Defendant:
Darin Cook and DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Rock et al
as 9:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
David Rock, Jerry Laramary, Theodore Zerniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Uhler
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent, Stanley Tulip, C.O., Darin Cook, C.O. and others
Tafari v. Baker
as 13-1479
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, from 9:11-cv-1476, George Waterson, 9:11-cv-1429, Jason Ferrick, from 12-cv-662 and others
Appellee:
Richard Roy, from 9:12-cv-269, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Thomas Quinn, from 9:11-cv-1390 and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Tafari v. Uhler
as 12-5062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald Uhler, Deputy Superintendent, Stanley Tulip, C.O., Darin Cook, C.O. and others
Tafari v. Uhler et al
as 9:2011cv01390
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Stanley Tulip, Darin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Leclaire
as 11-2821
Defendant:
C.O. Smith, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, William Chase, Upstate Correctional Facility, Adams and others
Appellee:
Brad Reit, Upstate Correctional Facility, Donald Selsky, Jerry Hebert and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Rong Ran v. Bill Ross, et al
as 10-14626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONG RAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL ROSS, Customer Service Director, MARTIN MERTZ, Customer Service Supervisor, INFINITE ENERGY INC. and others
Tafari v. Leclaire et al
as 9:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
Lucien Leclaire, Richard Roy, Dale Artus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 9:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
