Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Acevedo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11808
Plaintiff:
Norma Acevedo, Maureen Adkins, Julie Ahrens and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Amazon.com, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 25-3099
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Real Party In Interest:
ELIZABETH DE COSTER, MAYA GOLD, OSAHON OJEAGA and others
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Nicole Aaron et al v. Epson America, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01712
Petitioner:
Rick Allen, Dawn Adams, Nicole Aaron and others
Respondent:
Epson America, Inc.
Defendant:
Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Brown et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown, Scott Graeber, Laura Loes and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Davenport v. Charter Communications, LLC
as 4:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Penny Davenport, James Rachal, Jimmie III Floyd and others
Defendant:
Charter Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
COLE v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DAVID ATWOOD, N.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janis v. Ashcroft et al
as 2:2007cv03645
Plaintiff:
Gust Marion Janis, .
Defendant:
John Ashcroft, John Ashcroft, Michael R Bromwhich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
JANIS v. JOHN ASHCROFT, et al.,
as 1:2007cv00568
Plaintiff:
GUST MARION JANIS
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, MICHAEL R. BROMWHICH, AL HERRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
