Cases 1 - 10 of 272
Fourstar et al v. Berkebile et al
as 4:2020cv00099
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr. and Robert Mitchell, Sr.
Defendant:
Mary Smitherene, Unknow United States Probation and Parole Officer, Unknown Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Stancil
as 1:2018cv01733
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Bishop
Respondent:
David Berkebile and M. A. Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bishop v. Berkebile
as 4:2018cv00822
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Bishop
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Manetirony Clervrain v. David Berkebile, Warden
as 18-60293
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID BERKEBILE
James Couture v. David Berkebile, et al
as 17-35906
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR COUTURE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID BERKEBILE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Castro-Alvardo v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Juan Castro-Alvardo
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McIntosh v. Pruitt et al.
as 6:2016cv00460
Petitioner:
Richard Scott McIntosh
Respondent:
E Scott Pruitt and David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 5:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Asa Roberts
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, David Berkebile, Virgil Ensey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Canda v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Edward Canda
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Montana Department of Corrections, David Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv02849
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, David Berkebile, Tara Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
