Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jean-Pierre Ronet v. Heston Silbert, et al
as 22-15942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant / Appellee:
HESTON SILBERT, Director, STEPHEN MORRISON, Administrative Service Manager, Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his official and individual capacity, DANIEL KILEY, Judge-Superior Court and others
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00888
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Kristen Smith, (f/n/u) Radtke and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Sumner County Courts et al
as 3:2019cv00335
Defendant:
Sumner County Courts, Judge David Dee Gay, Jason Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Phillip Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Dee v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 16-30548
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID DEE
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Dee v. Cain et al
as 2:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Dee
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Reece v. Lawrence Whitley, et al
as 13-5863
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RICHARDSON REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE RAY WHITLEY, TARA WILEY, WILLIAM G. LAMBERTH, II and others
Gooch v. Gay et al
as 3:2013cv00465
Plaintiff:
James A. Gooch, Jr.
Defendant:
David Dee Gay, William Joe Russell, Lytle A. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Thomas
as 4:2012cv00145
Plaintiff:
David Dee Cook
Defendant:
Philip Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Cook v. James Hunter, et al
as 10-5875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HUNTER, Judge, DAVID DEE GAY, Judge and WILLIAM LAMBERTH, District Attorney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
