Cases 1 - 10 of 22
United States of America v. Tryals
as 24-1358
Defendant:
MICHAEL DWAYNE TRYALS, Earl David Hollis, Leon Howard Blair and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deida v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00038
Defendant:
Warden, M Brumfield, M Gapski and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Deida
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18212
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Tryals
as 21-50026
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL DWAYNE TRYALS, AKA Leon Howard Blair, AKA Dave Brooks, AKA Earl David Hollis, AKA Texas Mike, AKA Michael Tryls
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOLLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04182
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Williams v. Simon et al
as 3:2020cv00574
Defendant:
Carlos Marshall, Case Manager Belinda Jackson, Luitenant Jamie Caston and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
David Hollis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Holly
as 1:2020cv03514
Defendant:
David Holly
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HOLLY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv07318
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
