Cases 1 - 10 of 25
(PC) Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
David Hunter and David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 4:2023cv04917
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hunter v. Funk et al
as 2:2022cv05156
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
Dr. Funk, Dr. Heinze, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court
as 2:2020cv01097
Petitioner:
David Hunter
Respondent:
Sacramento Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunter v. Rouse
as 5:2019cv06639
Defendant:
Badge 864 Rouse, Warden Scott, Stacey and others
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Superior Court et al
as 2:2018cv01752
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
Superior Court and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Fetch et al
as 2:2018cv01751
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
Carolyn Fetch and Sacramento Sheriff's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
as 5:2015md02624
Plaintiff:
Sterling International Consulting Group , David Hunter , Marie Wilson and others
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc. , Lenovo Group Limited, Superfish, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
as 4:2015md02624
Plaintiff:
Jayne Constanzo, Susan Webster-Shultz, Michelle Behren and others
Defendant:
Lenovo Inc., Lenovo Group Limited and Superfish, Inc.
In Re:
In Re: Lenovo Adware Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunter v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00819
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Superfish, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
