Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Milo Shammas v. Margaret Focarino
as 14-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILO SHAMMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARGARET FOCARINO, Commissioner of Patents
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and TERESA STANEK REA, Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Gambert v. Kappos
as 2:2013cv02077
Defendant:
David Kappos
Plaintiff:
Jason Gambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Critchley v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
David John Critchley
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Microvention, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01465
Plaintiff:
Microvention, Inc.
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Shammas v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01462
Plaintiff:
Milo Shammas
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Intrexon Corporation v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Intrexon Corporation
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
MannKind Corporation v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01421
Plaintiff:
MannKind Corporation
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Kineta Two, LLC v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kineta Two, LLC
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Baxter International, Inc. et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01316
Plaintiff:
Baxter International, Inc. and Baxter Healthcare S.A.
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
CAMPO'S DELI AT MARKET, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 2:2012cv05685
Plaintiff:
CAMPO'S DELI AT MARKET, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
