Cases 11 - 20 of 94
THACKER v. USA
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENT THACKER, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
(PC) Anderson v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Anderson
Defendant:
County of Shasta, Shasta County Sheriffs Office, Tom Bosenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitch v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Kent Fitch
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
David Kent v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russell v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01735
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Kent Russell
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08214
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENT NIXON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KENT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27629
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID KENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
