Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
US v. David Sherrill
as 22-4423
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID LORENZO SHERRILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01063
Plaintiff: DAVID LORENZO LEWIS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lorenzo Cruz v. Kai Jie Inc, et al
as 6:2019cv01159
Plaintiff: DAVID LORENZO CRUZ
Defendant: ZHANG FA RONG, KAI JIE INC d/b/a Crystal Buffet Hibachi & Grill, Kai Jie Inc, and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
USA v. David Provencio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-50588
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID LORENZO PROVENCIO, also known as David Lorenzo Provencio, also known as David Provencio Sandoval, also known as Jose Provencio
Nicholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2018cv00501
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner: David Lorenzo Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. David Provencio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-50587
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID LORENZO PROVENCIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08604
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08399
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Provencio v. United States Of America
as 3:2016cv00251
Petitioner: David Lorenzo Provencio
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?