Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Martin v. ODS Community Dental, et al.
as 26-3101
Plaintiff: DAVID MARTIN
Defendant: ODS COMMUNITY DENTAL, SKYLINE ORAL FACIAL AND DENTAL IMPLANT SURGERY, CAREOREGON and others
Type: Contract Insurance
Snyder et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04475
Plaintiff: Christopher Snyder, Jessica Stiegler, Dionna Gayle and others
Defendant: Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sampson v. Moore, et al.
as 26-2703
Plaintiff: KENDRICK SAMPSON
Defendant: Chief MICHEL MOORE, individually, as a supervisor, and in his official capacity as Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Peterson v. Martin, et al.
as 26-2725
Plaintiff: KYLE PETERSON
Defendant: Officer DAVID MARTIN, an individual, Officer ANSON BUSTAMANTE, an individual, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California municipal entity and others
Martin et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 5:2026cv00874
Plaintiff: David Martin and Toni Martin
Defendant: Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and STC Enterprises Inc doing business as The Carpenter Agency doing business as Trident Insurance Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00293
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Martin v. Bouchard
as 2:2026cv11007
Plaintiff: Brian David Martin
Defendant: Michael Bouchard
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2026cv00606
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. City Portland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00405
Plaintiff: David Martin
Defendant: City Portland, Multnomah County, Tri Met and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv02431
Plaintiff: David Martin
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?