Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Vance Gardner, et al v. MeTV
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
DAVID VANCE GARDNER and GARY MERCHANT
Defendant:
METV, a National Limited Partnership
NOONAN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02590
Plaintiff:
DAVID VANCE NOONAN JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
National Republican Senatorial Committee et al v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, James David Vance and others
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission, Allen J. Dickerson, Dara Lindenbaum and others
Gardner et al v. MeTV
as 1:2022cv05963
Plaintiff:
David Vance Gardner, Jeannetta McElroy and Earl Hayes
Defendant:
MeTV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-1958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
DIRECTV, LLC v. David Vance
as 22-250
Petitioner:
DIRECTV, LLC
Respondent:
DAVID VANCE, ROXY VANCE, CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated and others
USA v. David Vance
as 21-3117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID VANCE
Creasy v. Gay et al
as 3:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
William G. Creasy
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Lawrence Ray Whitely, Lytle A. Jame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
