Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thompson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
David W Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wagner et al
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Wagner, FNU Smith, FNU Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tepe v. Corker et al
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hemrick v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03101
Plaintiff:
David W. Hemrick
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wendt et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2023ct03047
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Samuel Clement Wendt, Brandon S. Goins and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. SCARANTINO
as 1:2022cv00460
Petitioner:
DAVID W. TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN T. SCARANTINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Warden FMC Butner
as 5:2022hc02075
Petitioner:
David W. Taylor
Respondent:
Warden FMC Butner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
