Cases 1 - 10 of 908
Davis v. Hamrick et al
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
Howard S. Hamrick and Walnut Ridge Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davis v. Forest River, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Chad A. Davis
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cooper v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Kiera Cooper and Quantez Burks
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Brandy Eastridge, Kayla Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sill v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Glen Davis Sill
Defendant:
Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Beckley ARH Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Fletcher
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Warden R. Brown, c/o Captain D. Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Richard Odell Davis, III
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
De'Maurea Davis, Yae-Yae and Yae Prince
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00813
Petitioner:
Jennifer Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
