Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fulkerson v. Ricketts et al
as 4:2022cv03162
Petitioner:
Michael E. Fulkerson
Respondent:
Pete Ricketts, Nebraska State Patrol and Dawson County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Due v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Matthew R. Hoffman and Robert T. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Due v. Dawson et al
as 8:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
Robert T. Dawson, Matthew R. Hoffman and Brian D. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Martinez v. Dawson et al
as 8:2020cv00408
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Adrian Gutierrez Martinez
Respondent:
Tom Barr, Group Facilitator, Mark Labouchardier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dawson et al
as 8:2020cv00275
Petitioner:
Marvel Jones
Respondent:
Mark Labouchanoiere and Sheri Dawson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LeFever v. Dawson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2020cv03066
Defendant:
Deputy Ivan Castellanos and Dawson County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Luke LeFever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Due v. Bataillon et al
as 8:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Richard G. Koph, Matthew R. Hoffman, Warden Werlich and others
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bergman v. Dawson County, Nebraska et al
as 4:2020cv03001
Plaintiff:
James Bergman
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Dawson County, Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
