Cases 1 - 10 of 358
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Benjamin Brooks v. DCFS et al
as 2:2024cv03157
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Brooks
Defendant:
DCFS, Yolanda Barcla, Victor Sibrian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yang-Dawkins v. Buford et al
as 1:2024cv01974
Plaintiff:
Christina Yang-Dawkins
Defendant:
Andrea Buford, DCFS, Paris McCleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballester v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Ballester
Defendant:
Judge Laura H. Miller, Presiding Judge Maureen F. Hallahan, Judge CJ Mody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10975
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Rayvon Boatman v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, LLC, et al
as 24-10887
Plaintiff:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant:
WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, DONALD SAWYER, EMILY SALEMA and others
Anglin v. ChildNet et al
as 1:2024cv20592
Plaintiff:
Valtshia Lashawn Denise Anglin
Defendant:
ChildNet, Jodi-ann Edwards, Tahnese Veer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dean v. Dean, et al.
as 5:2024cv04008
Plaintiff:
Brittany Elizabeth Dean, Brittany Ecton and Brittany Sciara
Defendant:
Dana Dean, Dan Dean, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
