Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Coupa Software Incorporated v. DCR Workforce, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Coupa Software Incorporated
Defendant:
DCR Workforce, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DCR Workforce, Inc. v. Coupa Software Incorporated
as 3:2023cv02234
Plaintiff:
dcr workforce, inc.
Defendant:
coupa software incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lambka v. Beales
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Neil David Lambka
Defendant:
Ryan Beales, West Virginia Parole and DCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DCR Marketing, Inc. v. U.S. Alliance Group, Inc.
as 23-55137
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DCR MARKETING, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. ALLIANCE GROUP, INC., DBA Alternative Payments International
Jesse Copen, Sr. v. Pam Daniels
as 22-7056
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE JAMES COPEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAM DANIELS, DCR Employed?, ERIN LYNN, Parole Officers Supervisor, MISTY FLETCHER, DHHR Worker and others
DCRS CORP v. DIGI AMERICA CORP
as 3:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
DCRS CORP
Defendant:
DIGI AMERICA CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
King v. DCR/SCRJ et al
as 2:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee King
Defendant:
DCR/SCRJ and LT. Jaburs Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DCR Workforce, Inc. v. Coupa Software, Inc.
as 22-15328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DCR WORKFORCE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUPA SOFTWARE, INC.
Raven Scores, Limited v. DCR Finance Corp.
as 1:2022cv00739
Plaintiff:
Raven Scores, Limited
Defendant:
DCR Finance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-80, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2021cv06466
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1
Defendant:
Does 1-80, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 1 AUTO AD LTD, Doe 2 Bolu Shiwan MS Glass Fibre Prodacts Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
