Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cassel v. Todd et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Ashley L. Cassel
Defendant:
Tristen Todd, Karen Bishop, Rebecca Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fowler v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Dean Fowler
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOWLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19686
Plaintiff:
DEAN FOWLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Fowler et al
as 7:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramsey Aaron Brown
Defendant:
Dean Fowler, Lauren Parish, Lyle Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Fowler v. Manuel Fields, et al
as 19-20500
Defendant / Appellee:
MANUEL FIELDS, DAVID AND IVORY MINISTRIES, INCORPORATED, DONNA ROASONOVER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY DEAN FOWLER
Fowler v. Fields et al
as 4:2019cv02215
Respondent:
David and Ivory Ministries, inc., Manuel Fields, Donna Roasonover and others
Petitioner:
Ricky Dean Fowler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Fowler v. Sheronda Guyton, et al
as 17-20676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY DEAN FOWLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERONDA GUYTON, District Parole Officer, A. ISAAC, Parole Division Representative and DAVID G. GUTIERREZ, Board Chairman
Fowler v. Guyton et al
as 4:2017cv02665
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dean Fowler
Defendant:
Sheronda Guyton, A. Isaac and David G. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler v. Fondren et al
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ricky Dean Fowler
Defendant:
Matt Fondren, Rissie Owens and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Division of Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-41157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
