Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13023
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE DERRELL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. GTR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DERRELL JONES
Defendant:
GTR ENTERPRISES INC, FRANKLIN R. ROLLINS, JR., CALEB LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mario Jones v. Tennessee Department of Correction, et al
as 22-5292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO D. JONES and MARIO DERRELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLE, and Probation, LOIS M. DEBERRY, Special Needs and others
US v. Roderick Jones
as 21-4267
Defendant / Appellant:
RODERICK DERRELL JONES, a/k/a Coffee, a/k/a Base
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DERRELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON et al v. MORRIS COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2020cv20713
Defendant:
NEAL HAMILTON, MAUREEN MILLER, DELORRES MANN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON, DEBORAH JONES-WASHINGTON, MICHAEL WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BODIE v. CAROLINA HANDLING LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
CHAD T BODIE
Defendant:
CAROLINA HANDLING LLC and DERRELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Jones v. New York City
as 1:2016cv03140
Plaintiff:
Derrell Jones
Defendant:
New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. New York City
as 1:2016cv03052
Plaintiff:
Derrell Jones
Defendant:
New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent et al v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Vincent and Jennifer C. Vincent
Defendant:
Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. and Damon Derrell Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
