Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Collins II v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Derrick Collins II
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Collins v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
Derrick Collins
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Collins
as 23-30165
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Darrick Collins, also known as Derrick Collins
Collins v. United States of America, et al.
as 3:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Derrick Collins
Defendant:
United States of America, Laura Lothman Lambert, Kevin C. Frein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Derrick Collins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Collins et al
as 1:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
Derrick Collins, Joseph Campbell, Marianne Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLENSWORTH et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv01019
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ALLENSWORTH , JAMES AMOS , MICHAEL ANTHONY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
In re: Derrick Collin
as 13-13922
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK COLLINS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Moye v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Plaintiff:
Malinka Tacuma Wade Moye
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, State of California, Lydia Dianne Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. City of Fairfield, et al
as 2:2010cv01245
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Fairfield Police Department, Kevin Carella and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
