Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Maurice Dews v. Brian Lammer
as 26-2235
Petitioner:
MAURICE T. DEWS
Respondent:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (e)(2)-(o)(t) - Job Discrimination (Other)
Tottenham Hotspur Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv05678
Plaintiff:
Tottenham Hotspur Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Give the talent, Huanweisi and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Dew v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2026cv01659
Plaintiff:
Billy R Dew, Jr
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, City of Tallulah, Police Dept Tallulah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maurice T. Dews v. Brian Lammer
as 26-2031
Petitioner:
MAURICE T. DEWS
Respondent:
BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
CRUM v. WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2026cv00112
Plaintiff:
RYAN CRUM
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY JAIL, BRAD SEACAT, BRENT MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORRIS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2026cv01395
Plaintiff:
AVIETTE NORRIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and KALEASE ANONKHA DEW
Cause Of Action: 01DCC2439 WMATA (court jurisdiction)
Dew-Thompson v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2026cv02524
Plaintiff:
Janice Dew-Thompson
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dew Beauty Inc. v. United States
as 1:2026cv01206
Plaintiff:
Dew Beauty Inc.
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
