Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Williams v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2024cv01528
Defendant: E R T Riley, E R T Allen and Sheriffs Dept Caddo Parish
Plaintiff: Grandville Dewayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Darby
as 24-30591
Petitioner: Grandville Dewayne Williams
Respondent: Disha Darby, Warden, Steve Prator and Ramona Emanuel, Judge
In re: Marshall Williams
as 24-1774
Petitioner: In re: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Williams v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00624
Plaintiff: Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant: State of Louisiana, Sheriff Whitehorn, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 5:2024cv00585
Petitioner: Marshall DeWayne Williams
Respondent: Warden of Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14232
Petitioner: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent: FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Flake et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06833
Defendant: The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff: Renata Flake, Veronica Button, Brian Lee Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Flake et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv10115
Defendant: The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Renata Flake, Veronica Button, Brian Lee Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Marshall Williams v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 23-13759
Petitioner / Appellant: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Williams v. Williams-Reese
as 5:2023cv01492
Plaintiff: Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant: Dorothy Daphne Williams-Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?