Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 5:2026cv12393
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Taylor v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2026cv11289
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor #165287 v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2026cv01159
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor #165287
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muma v. Flint Township Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv13430
Defendant:
Douglas Hart, Michael Schuyler, Phillip McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Juleana Muma
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Dexter Taylor v. Michael Shepard, et al
as 20-3113
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SHEPARD, MALCOLM DOMIO, GARRY MCCARTHY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEXTER TAYLOR
Gaston et al v. Islamic Republic Of Iran
as 1:2018cv12337
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Bernadette Montalvo and others
Defendant:
Islamic Rebuplic Of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Gaston et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12338
Plaintiff:
Christian Blom, Andrew Canonico, Tamia Howard and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2018cv00657
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Duane Dexter Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Shepard et al
as 1:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor
Defendant:
Michael Shepard, Malcolm Domio, Garry McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Domino et al
as 1:2015cv09741
Plaintiff:
Dexter Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Malcolm Domino, Michael Shepard, Department of Streets and Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
