Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Dixon v. Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain
as 2:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Mike Dixon
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Taylor v. Excel Inc.,
as 2:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Abria Taylor
Defendant:
Excel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Northwest Administrators Inc v. DHL Express (USA) Inc
as 2:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Blackwell v. DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc.
as 0:2023cv61587
Plaintiff:
Shervon Blackwell
Defendant:
DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. doing business as DHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Madsen v. Sidwell Air Freight et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Heather Madsen
Defendant:
Sidwell Air Freight and DHL Express (USA) Inc doing business as DHL Express
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DOAKS v. EXEL, INC. d/b/a DHL SUPPLY CHAIN (USA)
as 1:2022cv02232
Plaintiff:
KEENAN DOAKS
Defendant:
EXEL, INC. d/b/a DHL SUPPLY CHAIN (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miranda v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Walters v. Exel Inc
as 3:2022cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jason Walters
Defendant:
Exel Inc doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Young et al v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Michael Young and Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
